Richard Nakka’s Experimental Rocketry Web Site

________________________________________________

 

Introduction to Rocket Design

 

Appendix J

Ejection Charge Design and Construction

 

Introduction

In this appendix, I will provide details on the design and construction of the ejection charge, (alternately referred to as deployment pyro) that I have used for my latest generation of EX rockets.

 

 

Design and Construction

Figure 1 illustrates an ejection charge assembly. The same design is used for both the apogee separation event pyro and for parachute deployment pyro. The only variant is the length of the casing, which accommodates the charge of deployment pyrolant. The design of this ejection charge is intended to provide a degree of containment. Containment allows pressure buildup and aids rapid combustion of the charge and helps prevent dispersal of unburnt pyrolant.

 

Figure 1: ejection charge assembly
       

The casing is a length of paper drinking straw. Modern (biodegradable) paper straws are actually quite rigid and strong. They have a polymer coating on the interior that prevents them from becoming soggy in use. This mislabeled rocketry item is ideally suited as a ejection charge casing. The straw that I currently use for my Xi rocket has an OD of 8.6mm and a wall thickness of 0.4mm. Burst pressure is calculated to be nearly 800 psi (however is likely to be somewhat lower as the tube is spiral-wound).  Length of the casing is in the range of 51 to 55mm and holds a charge mass of 1.5 to 1.8 grams. The charge is granular Crimson Powder (CP). Black Powder is an alternative pyrolant. The measured bulk density of granular CP is 0.79 grams per cubic centimetre. As such, it is straightforward to calculate the volume required for a given mass of CP, or the required length for a given diameter straw.

 

Figure 2: Paper drinking straws
       

Both ends of the casing are sealed with hot-melt adhesive. At one end, the adhesive also serves to secure the electrical leads. This end is prepared first, after which the desired quantity of CP is loaded. The paper wad serves as a thermal insulator, which is installed prior to sealing the other end with hot-melt adhesive.

 

The bridgewire is the nichrome wire element that gets hot when electrical current is supplied. The bridgewire is soldered to the copper lead wires.  I use no. 46 gauge nichrome wire that has a diameter of 0.0015˛ (0.04mm). This is extremely fine wire, not much thicker than a human hair. Figure 3 illustrates a sample of this wire, together with heavier no. 38 gauge nichrome that I use for my motor igniters (purchased from McMaster-Carr). For comparison, a standard sewing needle is shown.

 

Figure 3: Nichrome wire samples compared to sewing needle
       

I originally used no. 38 gauge nichrome wire for my ejection charges. I became concerned with the reliability, especially in cold weather, as I utilize a 9V battery for the powering the flight computers, and not having a separate dedicated battery for the pyro charges. As it happened, some years earlier I had purchased a roll of this very fine no. 46 gauge nichrome wire at Active Surplus on Queen St. in Toronto (an amazing place which, sadly, shuttered its doors about a decade ago). At the time I thought it was probably too fine gauge to be of practical use, but I couldn’t pass up on this mislabeled rocketry item. So I decided to do some testing of this wire and found that the current drawn by a typical 10mm bridgewire was only about 500mA. The wire got very hot instantly and burned out in a fraction of a second. This is exactly what is desired for igniting a pyrotechnic charge such as CP. After conducting ground testing of ejection charge assemblies using this fine nichrome wire, which verified its effectiveness, I started using this nichrome wire for my rocket flights. Since that time, I have made hundreds of such ejection charges and the reliability has proven to be nearly 100% (one failed due to an imperfect solder joint that escaped detection).

 

It is, of course, not necessary to use such fine gauge nichrome wire for ejection charges. I have used what I had on-hand. But I believe it is fair to say that the finer the wire, the higher the reliability can potentially be, especially with lighter capacity batteries such as 9V cells.

The electrical leads should be solid, not stranded wire. I use  24 AWG or 26 AWG wire. For reliability, the nichrome bridgewire must be soldered to the electrical leads. Use acid-based soldering flux (not rosin based) and solder for stainless steel for best results.

Figure 4: Roll of no.46 nichrome wire (left) and no.38 nichrome wire (right)
       

 

Quality control checks of the ejection charge assemblies are important, as these are flight critical items.

1)    Verify adhesive caps provide a complete seal with no gaps, using a magnifying glass, in order to prevent pyrolant from spilling out and to ensure proper pressure containment when the pyro fires.

2)    Verify integrity of solder joint of bridgewire to copper wire leads using 30× magnifier.

3)    Once ejection charge has been assembled, do a resistance check (not a continuity check). Nichrome wire has a defined resistance per unit length, depending on gauge. For example, my 10mm bridgewires typically have a resistance of about 10 ohms.

 

Figure 5: Apogee Primary (AP) ejection charge for Xi rocket
       

 

 

Last updated January 6, 2025

Originally posted January 6, 2025

 

Return to Recovery System Page

Return to Home page